Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Palin, on the record, is not what Republicans claim her to be

While Republican Vice Presidential hopeful, Sarah Palin, delivered a rousing speech tonight at the RNC attacking Barack Obama’s lack of experience and denouncing Democratic values, it’s only fair game to also look at her record.

Republicans claim that Palin is a progressive reformer, but in fact turns out to be a major supporter of eamarks and porkbarrel spending. For example, Palin is a director of a Ted Stevens’ (the Alaska GOP senator recently indicted on public-corruption charges) 527 group raising corporate money. Palin takes credit for signing a major ethics law, but the impetus for the law came from legislators, especially Democrats. Palin claims to be a champion for small town Americans when she has supported increasing the regressive sales tax, even for items like food. She also supported the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere,” a $223 million tax payer earmark and then denies to ever have supported it. Though the bridge was never built, this porkbarrel money was still allocated to Alaska for infrastructure. In September 2006 Palin spoke in Ketchikan, saying the bridge was essential to the town. Palin also hired Washington lobbyists to secure taxpayer money for her hometown, securing more than $27 million, including $1.9 million for a transportation hub. The largest earmark was $15 million for a rail link between Wasilla and the ski resort community of Girdwood, home town of Senator Ted Stevens.

Republicans claim that Palin is in touch with people when in fact her views are extreme and out of the mainstream. Her values and positions on every issue is the extreme opposite of Hillary Clinton. She opposes abortion even for rape and incest victims, and has suggested adding requiring parental consent for abortions to Alaskan constitution. Palin has strongly promoted oil and natural gas resource development in Alaska, including opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to drilling. She does not believe global warming is caused by humans. She is opposed to listing polar bears as an endangered species. She has supported expanding wolf hunting. The pastor of Palin’s Pentecostal Church says critics of George W. Bush will go to hell. In June 2008, Palin spoke before this Church and claimed the Iraq War is a “task from God.”

The real question for undecided voters to ask: Is Palin prepared to be Commander in Chief? The McCain-Palin ticket’s argument is to attack Obama on his lack of experience. However, Palin’s own political experience is limited. She has served as Governor of Alaska for 20 months. Prior to this she has served as mayor of a small town. She has no foreign policy or national political experience. Republican charge on Palin having more “executive experience” than Obama and Biden combined is empty rhetoric. By this logic she more experience than John McCain as well. Biden has spent 36 years in the U.S. Senate, and has been Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. By contrast, Palin received her first passport in 2007.

Even fellow Republicans in Alaska question Palin’s readiness. "She's not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president?" said Lyda Green, the president of the Alaskan State Senate, a Republican from Palin's hometown of Wasilla. "Look at what she's done to this state. What would she do to the nation?" Another top Alaskan Republican, John Harris, the speaker of the House, when asked about her qualifications for Vice Presidency, replied with this: "She's old enough. She's a U.S. citizen."

Palin’s own mother-in-law, Faye Palin, says: “I’m not sure what she brings to the ticket, other than she’s a woman and a conservative.” In an interview with Larry Kudlow on CNBC, Palin stated: “As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what it is exactly that the VP does every day?”

When asked in an interview about her thoughts about the Iraq War Surge, she said: “I’ve been so focused on state government; I haven’t really focused much on the war in Iraq.” McCain’s choice of Palin as his running mate with little vetting demonstrates McCain’s tendency to make reckless decisions. Picking Palin reflects a trend of Republicans choosing unqualified candidates (Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, Alberto Gonzalez as Attorney General, Michael Brown as director of FEMA, etc.)

It’s pretty obvious from the above that Palin, on the record, is not what Republicans claim her to be.



No comments: